Terrorism Act 2000 Urgent Please Read

Terrorism Act 2000 urgent alert to all activists coming into the UK

As far as I know this law has been used to detain and question activists only once before at a sea port so has rarely been used by police against activists. Two of us were detained last night on flying back from Oslo and arriving at Birmingham and I feel that it is important that other activists are aware of these extraordinary police powers and how to avoid them intruding where they really should not. I and my companion were released after a few hours of what they called “examination” and we did talk to lawyers and there was a bit of comedy value to the whole farce so it was not all bad BUT they can stop and question ANYONE they want so be prepared all who wish to enter the UK whatever your beliefs are, whatever your activism entails.

We walked through the passport bit and were stopped by a Detective Constable called Jack 3876 and a woman 1245 from West Midlands police who wanted to know our names and addresses and occupations, where we had been, what we had done, who we had met etc. A little bemused by the questioning I stopped answering at “occupation” (let alone who, what why, where...) and lo and behold they decided that they had suspicions and that they wanted a more cosy little chat we were taken to a desk and told to fill in cards which included information about name, address, date of birth etc. We filled in what we could (ie not al lot)and then came questions about how we paid for flights. They then looked at my credit card which is a Visa and has for many years paid some small amount to Amnesty International and has the AI logo on it. They really did not like this saying that caring about human rights was suspicious and we were detained under the Terrorism Act 2000 and separated for questioning.

For those who are not aware PACE does not apply in this instance. It appears (as this has not been challenged in court) that the detained person commits an offence under this act if s/he refuses to answer any questions and they were getting quite cross with me when I did not “cooperate” almost shouting “you HAVE to answer”. For those who utter the mantra “if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about” the questions included asking about my parents details, if I had any children, work, colleagues, friends, if I had a partner, any drug addictions, religious beliefs all in all far beyond the remit of preventing terrorism and well into the realms of a gigantic fishing expedition coupled with threats of prolonged incarceration. I was under the distinct impression that if I did answer a question about for example my mother that it would lead to many more questions of a personal nature so I refused to play that little game.

First they tried to intimidate by saying that if I did not answer questions that they would hold me for 9 hours, then arrest me under the Terrorism Act and hold me for 48 hours then apply to a magistrate and hold me for 7 days. This was followed by an emphasis on the fact that unlike under PACE I was not entitled to free legal advice with them implying that it would cost a fortune to access a lawyer. I demanded one anyway (and would advise others to do the same money can be raised afterwards) and spoke to a good human rights lawyer who helped me as much as he was able. They can (if a Superintendant believes it is appropriate) refuse ANY access to a lawyer or 48 hours, I was apparently not entitled to a private conversation with my lawyer, police were present at all times, if PACE applied it would have been breached. As the attempts at intimidation did not work and Gene Hunt declined an appearance it was then on to sympathising with animal rights (ohh I HATE fur etc etc ad infinitum). This then went on to trying to provoke anger which consisted of getting out all my T shirts and taking the piss out of some of the sentiments written on them for example “what’s wrong with angling?” using a rather mocking tone and then writing down all the slogans they seemed to like the SPEAK T’shirt especially and were at one stage going to keep it, runners up were the WARN hoodie and a CAFT T’shirt which I admit has a naughty word on it! This was rather amusing it has to be said. More

Four Years Ago: THE LONDON 7/7 BOMBINGS

Global Research brings to the attention of its readers key articles on the London July 7, 2005 bombings

7/7 Mock Terror Drill: What Relationship to the Real Time Terror Attacks? - by Michel Chossudovsky - 2005-08-08 A fictional "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's underground took place at exactly the same time as the real bomb attack on July 7, 2005. There have been several documented cases of mock terror drills in the US and the UK, held prior or on the same day as the actual terror event.

London 7/7 Terror Suspect Linked to British Intelligence? - by Michel Chossudovsky - 2005-08-01 "This is the guy, and what's really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the British government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him"

The London Police's Mossad-style Execution of a 'Suspect' - by Professor John Gardner - 2005-07-27 There is no special police licence to injure or kill. If they injure or kill, the police need to rely on the same law as the rest of us. It is no defence in law that the killing was authorised by a superior officer. A superior officer who authorises an unlawful killing is an accomplice.

British Cops trained in Israel - by Michel Chossudovsky - 2005-07-24 The shoot to kill policy was undertaken under the auspices of "Operation Kratos". It was carried out by the London Metropolitan's elite SO19 firearms unit often referred to as the Blue Berets.

British terror trial raises question of what MI5 knew about 2005 London bombings - by Julie Hyland - 2007-05-09

Britain now faces its own blowback Intelligence interests in Britain may thwart the July 7/7 bombings investigation - by Michael Meacher - 2005-09-11

The ‘Evil Ideology’ The teachings of Islam are peace and equality - by Ghali Hassan - 2005-07-25

London 7/7 Attack: Creating the Enemy - by Ghali Hassan - 2005-07-14

Birth of the London Bomb Official Story The bombers are all dead, and dead men tell no tales - by Xymphora - 2005-07-13

London Bombings - "Today we are all Londoners ...." The innocent always bear the scars, suffer the ultimate sacrifice, of mistaken political policies. - by Felicity Arbuthnot, Luci Carolan. - 2005-07-13

FOR MORE ARTICLES ON THE LONDON 7/7 BOMBINGS CLICK HERE

Top CIA officials appear before jury over destruction of al-Qaida tapes

• 92 video tapes may have been illegally destroyed
• London station chief included in inquiry

Senior Central Intelligence Agency officials, including the London station chief, have been brought before a grand jury in Virginia investigating the potentially illegal destruction of 92 video tapes recording the torture and interrogation of al-Qaida detainees.

A special prosecutor, John Durham, has called the CIA officials as part of an 18-month-long criminal probe in to the destruction of evidence of the agency's interrogators using waterboarding and other forms of torture against Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al Nashiri who are described by the Americans as "high value" detainees now held at Guantánamo Bay.

Those ordered to testify include the former CIA chief, Porter J Gross. Another is a woman who is not publicly named who heads the agency's London station. She previously worked as the chief of staff for the head of the CIA's clandestine branch, Jose Rodriguez, who is the focus of the investigation.

The New York Times reports that former CIA officers have identified the woman as having helped carry out Rodriguez's order to destroy the tapes which had been kept in a safe in at the agency's station in Thailand where the torture and interrogations were carried out.

Rodriquez is reported to have been concerned that agents might have been identified and endangered if the tapes leaked.

But the CIA will also have been concerned that some of its agents may have been open to prosecution under domestic and international laws against torture besides the enormous damage to its already battered reputation if video were made public of the extended torture and brutal techniques used against the captives. The impact is likely to have been much greater than the outcry caused by the pictures of abuse by US soldiers at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison.

President Obama has since pledged not to prosecute individual agents for their part in torture and interrogations because they were assured by the Bush administration that their actions were legal.

The investigation was launched because the destruction of the tapes may amount to a criminal offense because it was evidence that could have been used in any prosecutions for torture. Robriquez has told colleagues that he received legal guidance from CIA lawyers who told him he had the authority to order the destruction of the tapes.

However it remains open to question whether anyone will be brought to trial for that or other alleged offenses given the Obama administration's desire to reassure CIA agents that they will not be pursued over past crimes.

The existence of the tapes was only made public after they were destroyed.
On Thursday, the Obama administration said it will delay until the end of next month the release of a 2004 CIA report detailing the torture and other abuse of prisoners held in clandestine prisons oversees.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/03/cia-al-qaida-guantanamo-interrogation/print

Daily Mail: rumours swell that the government staged 7/7

A video called Ripple Effect accuses Tony Blair, and elements of the Government, the police, and the British and Israeli Secret Services of carrying out the London Tube bombings.

It is alleged that the four British Muslims were tricked into taking part in what they were told would be a mock anti-terror training exercise.

The Ripple Effect video claims government agents set off pre-planted explosives under the three Tube trains and on the bus.

It suggests that the four Muslims were not on any of the Tube trains.

Dr Mohammad Naseem, the chairman of Birmingham's Central Mosque, says: 'We do not accept the government version of July 7, 2005. The Ripple Effect video is more convincing than the official statements.'

Naseem has said that the identities of the bombers were discovered by the police suspiciously quickly.

'When a body is blown up, it is destroyed. How is it that the identification papers found at the bomb scenes of these men were still intact? Were they planted?' More

7/7 Ripple Effect

A video you can't debunk

The best researched video I've seen on the London bombings yet.

"GOOGLE SPIDER GOATS"

THIS IS A CLIP FROM THE UPCOMING DOCUMENTARY/COMPILATION "GOOGLE SPIDER GOATS"

New 911 investigation needed to prove science does not lie

Imagine a crime is committed and the lead investigator names an individual as being responsible for the crime without having any hard evidence. Would the case hold up in a court of law?

Anyone with any common sense knows that in order to prosecute someone for a crime, you
must have some hard evidence against the defendant.

Would you believe me if I said the FBI admits they have no hard evidence connecting Osama bin
Laden to the attacks of Sept. 11? Not one mention of Sept. 11 can be found on bin Laden’s
most wanted poster.

This is only one piece of a massive puzzle that has a worldwide community searching for answers
and researching the facts. The 9/11 Truth Movement is comprised of people from all walks
of life with a common goal — a new independent investigation into the events of Sept. 11.
Many involved in the Truth Movement are family members of those who died on that fateful day.

Bob McIlvaine lost his son Bobby on Sept. 11 and is searching for answers. “[A]nd this is the legacy of my son. If I were to have died in those towers, he’d be doing the same thing. He wants to know the truth, I want to know the truth,” said an emotional Mcllvaine at the 9/11
Commission hearings in New York City in 2004.

When looking at all the evidence, nothing produces a “smoking gun” more than the collapse of both World Trade Center towers and World Trade Center Building 7.

All three buildings fell symmetrically at near freefall speed into the path of most resistance. !e National Institute for Standards and Technology investigated the collapse of both towers for the 9/11 Commission. More

Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged 7/7, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry

Today almost four years on, the images of that dreadful morning are etched into our minds: the woman in the haunting white burns mask being helped to safety; the shell-shocked businessman in a suit with his hair and shirt matted with blood; the crippled No 30 bus with its roof blown off; the mangled wreckage of smouldering Tube trains.

The country's worst-ever terrorist atrocity during London's morning rush hour on July 7, 2005, shattered for ever the heady euphoria in which the capital was basking the morning after winning the bid for the 2012 Olympics.

That afternoon, Tony Blair - who was hosting the G8 summit on global poverty in Gleneagles, Scotland - returned to Downing Street to pronounce that the attack was an act in the 'name of Islam'.

Later, at a meeting of the Government's national emergency committee COBRA, London's anti-terror police chief Andy Hayman told senior ministers that he suspected suicide bombers.

And so the story of 7/7 that we have come to accept was pieced together: four British Muslims - Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Jermaine Lindsay, 19, and Hasib Hussain, 18 - blew themselves up using home-made explosives, killing 56 and injuring 700 on three Tube trains and a double-decker bus.

They had travelled on a mainline train from Luton into King's Cross Thameslink Station in London, each carrying a heavy rucksack of explosives.

It is a version of events that has been endorsed by a high-level Parliamentary inquiry and a government report, both published in May 2006 ten months after the event, based on 12,500 statements, a police examination of 142 computers and 6,000 hours of CCTV footage.

The report insisted that the bombers acted on their own, constructing explosives from chapatti flour and hair bleach mixed in the bath at a flat in Leeds, Yorkshire, where all four had family and friends.

It concluded that the Muslim bombers were not controlled by a terrorist mastermind, but inspired by Al Qaeda ideology picked up on extremist websites.

But families of the dead victims and an increasing number of 7/7 survivors claim there are inconsistencies and basic mistakes in the official accounts that need explanation.

And they are demanding a full public inquiry to answer key questions about what the Intelligence Services and the police did and did not know before the bombings.

Meanwhile, the Government's determined refusal to meet their demands is having a very dangerous side-effect - fuelling myriad conspiracy theories about 7/7. Books, blogs and several video documentaries point to oddities in the official accounts.

Alarmingly, some of the conspiracy videos are being hawked around mosques throughout the country to whip up anti-British sentiment.

For the most outlandish and offensive of them suggest that the attacks were not the work of Muslim terrorists at all, but were carried out by the Government to boost support for the Iraq war.

The survivors are so intent on an independent inquiry that they are now taking legal action in the High Court to try to force the Home Secretary Alan Johnson to authorise it.

Campaigner Diana Gorodi, whose sister Michelle Otto, 46, was one of those killed, explains: 'It's just very hard for us to believe four people got up in the morning, put bombs together on the basis of information from the internet and managed to throw London into chaos and to create a tragedy. It's impossible for me to believe those four individuals acted on their own.'

Rachel North, a 39-year-old strategy director who survived the King's Cross Tube bombing, adds: 'We need a public inquiry. It was the public, after all, not the politicians, who were attacked. Let the public know what risks they run and tell them why there are those living among them who seek to kill for an ideal.'

Central to the puzzle is which train the four Muslims caught from Luton to London on the morning of the bomb blasts - bearing in mind that the three separate Tube explosions at Edgware Road, Aldgate and King's Cross occurred together at exactly 8.50am, followed by the red bus an hour later near Tavistock Square.

The official reports said the bombers got on the 7.40am train from Luton which would have arrived at King's Cross in good time for them to board the Tube trains.

However, the 7.40am train never ran that morning. It was cancelled.

The Government has since corrected this information - but only after the error was raised by survivors - saying the bombers actually caught an earlier train, the 7.25am from Luton, for the 35-minute journey to King's Cross. It was due to arrive in the capital at 8am.

Yet this throws up more questions than it answers. For this train ran 23 minutes late because of problems with the overhead line which disrupted most of the service between Luton to King's Cross that morning. It arrived in London at 8.23am, say station officials.

According to the July Seventh Truth Campaign - another group calling for a public inquiry - this again places the official version of the bombers' travelling times in doubt.

A still CCTV photo of the four bombers arriving at the station in Luton is the only one of the four men together on July 7. Controversially, no CCTV images, either still or moving, of them in London have ever been released.

The Luton image is also contentious: the quality is poor and the faces of three of the bombers are unidentifiable. The conspiracy theorists say it could be a fake.

This photo is timed at four seconds before 7.22am. But if this were the case, the men would have had just three minutes to walk up the stairs at Luton, buy their £22 day return tickets and get to the platform, which was packed with commuters because of the earlier travel disruptions.

The Truth Campaign group is equally sceptical about the bombers' supposed arrival time at King's Cross.

They say it takes seven minutes to walk from the Thameslink line station to the main King's Cross station, where there is an entrance to the Tube network.

Police say the four men were seen on the main King's Cross concourse at 8.26am, although no CCTV footage has ever been made public.

But is this possible? How had the men got there in three short minutes after getting off the Luton train at 8.23am?

And it is such inconsistencies that are fuelling the deepening concerns. This week, a television documentary on BBC2 called Conspiracy Files 7/7 revealed the existence of a conspiracy theorist's 56-minute video called Ripple Effect.

It accuses Tony Blair, the Government, the police, and the British and Israeli Secret Services of murdering the innocent people who died that day to stir up anti-Islamic fervour and create public support for the 'war on terror'.

It alleges that the four British Muslims were tricked by the authorities into taking part in what they were told would be a mock anti-terror training exercise. What they weren't told, the video alleges, was that the Government was going to blow them up, along with other passengers, then pretend the four were suicide bombers.

Without any evidence, the Ripple Effect video accuses government agents of setting off pre-planted explosives under the three Tube trains and on the bus.

It suggests that the four Muslims were not, in fact, on any of the Tube trains, claiming that they missed them altogether because of the train delays on the Luton to London line.

It adds, astonishingly, that because the four did not get onto the Tube on time, three of them were murdered by police at Canary Wharf later that morning and the fourth - the bus bomber - ran off.

Outrageous though these claims are, the video has become an internet hit. More worryingly, it is playing on the fears of Britain's Muslim community.

Even some senior Islamists believe the events of 7/7 were fabricated. As Dr Mohammad Naseem, the chairman of Birmingham's Central Mosque, says in the BBC2 documentary: 'We do not accept the government version of July 7, 2005. The Ripple Effect video is more convincing than the official statements.'

Mr Naseem, a well-educated man, had made 2,000 copies of Ripple Effect for members of his mosque. Research has revealed that even before the contentious video came out, one in four British Muslims thought the Government or the Secret Services were responsible for the 7/7 atrocities. Now the number of doubters is growing.

At Friday prayers recently, Dr Naseem asked the congregation to raise their hands if they did not accept the government version of events. Nearly the entire gathering of 150 men and boys did so. He then urged his audience to collect free copies of Ripple Effect at the back of the mosque.

The respected chairman has since said that the identities of the bombers were discovered by the police suspiciously quickly. 'When a body is blown up, it is destroyed. How is it that the identification papers found at the bomb scenes of these men were still intact? Were they planted?'

That is another suggestion in Ripple Effect. So who is behind this dangerous video?

He is 60-year-old Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill who lives in Kells, County Meath, Ireland. He is currently under arrest there and fighting extradition to Britain. Police here want to interview him on a charge of perverting the course of justice after he sent a copy of his video to a jury member in a terrorist case.

Mr Hill made Ripple Effect at his own home and is the narrator.

In many ways, it is an amateurish affair: the dialogue is jumbled and hard to understand. But that begs the question, why is Ripple Effect having such an impact?

The answer is that muddled in with the wild theories of a government plot are some questions that are hard to ignore.

Why did the four bombers get return tickets to London if they were on a one-way suicide mission? Why are there no CCTV images of the four together in London even though the city has thousands upon thousands of such cameras in public places?

Why did so many survivors of the Tube bombings say that the explosions came upwards through the floor of the trains, not down, as would be the case if a backpack blew up inside? And why do no passengers on the London-bound Luton train clearly remember the four bombers with their huge rucksacks on that fateful morning?

By the most extraordinary coincidence - Ripple Effect says it is a billion-to-one chance - there was a mock terrorist exercise going on in London that day. This was revealed by the organiser and former Scotland Yard officer Peter Power on BBC Radio 5 in the early evening after the atrocity.

He said: 'At half-past nine this morning we were running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up.'

And what of the menacing suicide videos that Khan and Tanweer made before the bombings, which were released on the internet after the attacks? The Ripple Effect video has an answer for this, too.

Mr Hill explains on it: 'The oldest would be asked to make a "suicide video" prior to the mock training exercise in order to make it as realistic as possible... the second oldest would also be asked to make a similar video, as a back-up, just in case anything went wrong or the oldest pulled out of the exercise before the date.'

Fact or fiction, it does not matter. The impact of the video is swaying Muslim feeling. The BBC2 documentary shows worshippers in the Birmingham mosque commenting on 7/7 after seeing Ripple Effect. One elderly man states: 'There can be little doubt that the Government did this themselves to these four young men.'

Another adds: 'We have been deceived by the British authorities, and Muslims have been framed for these attacks. They are lying from A to Z.'

Few are more concerned than Rachel North, the King's Cross Tube bomb survivor, about Ripple Effect and the discontent it is stirring up: 'If people in mosques think the Government is so antagonistic towards them, that they're actually willing to frame them for a monstrous crime they didn't commit, what does that do to levels of trust? That is a problem for everybody in this country.'

She says the video's central tenet - that 7/7 was faked to demonise Muslims and sway public opinion in favour of the 'war on terror' - is like throwing petrol on a fire.

Like her, many responsible people - and they include former Scotland Yard deputy assistant commissioner Brian Paddick, former anti-terror chief of London police Andy Hayman (who oversaw the police response to 7/7) and David Davis, until recently Tory Shadow Home Secretary - now support the call for an independent investigation into the bombings.

Paddick himself said this week, the torrent of rumours about 7/7 was harming relations between Muslims and the rest of Britain: 'Hopefully there will be people in the police service, the security service and Whitehall who will realise how important it is that every attempt is made to counteract these conspiracy theories.'

As the fourth anniversary of the London bombings approaches next Tuesday, they are words the Government would be wise to heed.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1197419/Conspiracy-fever-As-rumours-swell-government-staged-7-7-victims-relatives-proper-inquiry.html

The man who knew too much

Mystery widens in case of ‘CIA operative’ gunned down by police

Was Roland Carnaby a member of the U.S. intelligence community or a would-be spy? The mystery widens in the case of the man who claimed to be a CIA operative who was shot and killed by Houston police following a high-speed chase on Tuesday.

In fact, the only thing sure about the mystery surrounding Carnaby is that chase and fatal shooting.

Jeremy Desel tracks the mysterious trail of Roland Carnaby.

View larger player

Related video:
Shern-Min Chow: Former CIA operative casts doubts on Carnaby's CIA claims
Raw video of police chase
More KHOU.com Video

"When we do an investigation like this and you have so much mystery involved,” said Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt, who said he didn’t know who Carnaby was, even after a photo of the two from a Houston Policeman’s Ball was given to 11 News by Carnaby’s family. “And the fact that the individual is dead, and we want to make sure that we are doing a good job and give you accurate information."

The question of accuracy is key in this case, because so far much about Carnaby’s life is shrouded in mystery.

His family claims he was a long time CIA contractor. Certificates and distinctions from what appear to be service all over the globe to prove it. More

Roland Carnaby CIA agent killed, knew too much, trying to prevent a possible false flag attack around Houston with focus on terrorist and Mossad activity.

Houston Chronicle article

The Bigger Story Behind Michael Scheur's Wish for an Attack on America

Everyone is appropriately outraged that the former head of the CIA unit which hunted Bin Laden for almost a decade - Michael Scheur - told Glenn Beck:

The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States

But people aren't putting this in context. In fact, many Neocons have also stated a desperate yearning for another attack on America (and see this).

But there is another story here as well.

Remember:

• The CIA commander in charge of the capture of Bin Laden during the invasion of Afghanistan said that the U.S. let Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan

• A retired Colonel and Fox News military analyst said:

  "We know, with a 70 percent level of certainty — which is huge in the world of intelligence — that in August of 2007, bin Laden was in a convoy headed south from Tora Bora. We had his butt, on camera, on satellite. We were listening to his conversations. We had the world’s best hunters/killers — Seal Team 6 — nearby. We had the world class Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) coordinating with the CIA and other agencies. We had unmanned drones overhead with missiles on their wings; we had the best Air Force on the planet, begging to drop one on the terrorist. We had him in our sights; we had done it ....Unbelievably, and in my opinion, criminally, we did not kill Usama bin Laden."

• French soldiers insist that they easily could have captured or killed Bin Laden, but that the American commanders stopped them

In other words - as demonstrated above - the U.S. did not really try to capture Bin Laden.

And remember that the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11 discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here by the Co-Chair of the Joint Inquiry and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham; and see this Newsweek article). More

The Magic of Bin Laden

Most people hate and fear Osama Bin Laden. He is accused of being a mass murderer and an enemy of free people. That being said, the man is an amazing magician. He is undeniably, the most talented of all of the illusionists of today and for that matter, any day. Don't believe me? Read on. I think afterwards, you will agree that his slight of hand, his mind control performances and his 'supernatural' theatrics are second to none.

Bin Laden is a known recluse and his video and audio appearances have been few and far between. This adds to the mystique. I guess in all honesty, there is a lot of pressure on his shoulders to top the 9/11 performance. And what a performance it was. Clearly, it was a masterpiece. Let's revisit the 9/11' piece' and dissect it for the myriad of smaller illusions that became the master illusion and solidified Osama Bin Laden's name into the annals of magic. Everything that follows is fact and can be verified, except for my assertion that Bin Laden is the best illusionist of all time. That is just my opinion.

Let's talk about the little stuff first. His assistants were able to board 4 different planes without being caught on security cameras and without appearing on any of the passenger lists. None of his assistants had the ability to fly a jet airliner. Most were already working with the CIA and yet they agreed to the stunt. And finally, none of their bodies or DNA has ever been found. From Afghanistan, Bin Laden was able to fool the cameras and four ticket agents, pilot planes precisely into targets and then make his assistants disappear without a trace. This is gold, but the show was just beginning.

Next, came the mind control. Osama was able to confuse the US air defense system and prevent every single person in charge of defending the United States from doing their jobs and even performing their default options. Once again, from a cave in Afghanistan, Bin Laden was able to schedule his performance on the exact same day that several war games and several terror drills were all running.

Most of our fighter jets were in Alaska and northern Canada as a part of Operation Northern Vigilance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_games_in_progress_on_September_11,_2001 Global Guardian was running in conjunction with Vigilant Guardian . In essence, this is a massive nuclear air defense drill that puts blips all over radar screens and involves the United States Strategic Command in conjunction with Air Force Space Command and NORAD. But there is one drill he emulated, that really speaks to his genius. A National Reconnaissance Office drill was being run exactly in conjunction with Osama's real life performance that simulated a plane flying into a building!

Oh, and FEMA was running a bio-terrorism drill in New York City that morning http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fematape.html in conjunction with Mayor Guilliani's running Tripod 2 (an emergency management drill where he and all of his staff were well clear of their state of the art command center in WTC 7 as of the night before). http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/060704_tripod_fema.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW7Qvs-BZGk Amazing, and you have to ask yourself; how in the world did Bin Laden know about all of these opportunities to distract his audience?
Ask any illusionist what the secrets are to pulling off a great stunt and he/she will tell you; it takes massive preparation and endless attention to every detail. Provide a diversion and then, Pow! Make it unbelievable.

Bin Laden had to know that the default protocol for aircraft that veer from their flight path is a scramble and interception by US air defense. At that point, the aircraft, either corrects its course, is escorted to landing, or is shot down. 67 aircraft had been escorted to landing in 2001 through September 10. Yet, on September 11, in a performance that lasted for an hour and a half, 4 airliners all veered off course, not one interceptor was scrambled in time and 3 of the 4 reached their target, precisely and accurately.

But frankly, you know what is even more mystifying? Dick Cheney watched from the White House as the last blip came toward Washington DC. He wasn't evacuated from the White House. He never ordered the blip intercepted. He never ordered the blip shot down. He never ordered the Pentagon to use its ground to air defense system. He never stood up and shouted, 'Why isn't our air defense system following protocol?' This is sworn testimony by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta before the 9/11 Commission. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7Vs7KNlpXU It had to be mind control. To minimize damage and loss of life, Bin Laden directed the plane into the only part of the building to be recently reinforced to sustain such a hit.

Are you impressed yet? Well, this is all just been the set up for the big finish. Not satisfied with the simple display of accuracy and the 'Keystone Cop' confusion caused by his trans-Atlantic Jedi mind tricks, Bin Laden went for the inexplicable and the supernatural monster finale. Bin Laden was able to make not one, not two, but three buildings collapse into dust as if they were destroyed by carefully placed, incendiary devices. By not supplying an energy source for the free fall speed disintegrations of three skyscrapers, Osama Bin Laden literally suspended the laws of physics right before our eyes! Keep in mind that only two of the buildings were hit by planes. The third fell as an encore. There was some damage to a corner and 2 fires, but it pretty much looked like an intact, 47 story building that crimped and fell in six seconds. All that remained of three skyscrapers was severed steel, dust, flying paper and molten metal fires that burned at over 2000 degrees for two more months in the three sub floors. W'Allah! End of show. Or, was it?

Only after coming to terms with the absolute horror of this magic show did we realize; Osama Bin Laden, from a cave in Afghanistan on dialysis, had made the 4 jet airliners disappear as well. Now the two that hit the towers disappeared in the poison clouds that used to be buildings. Impressive, but smoke and mirrors you know. However, the aluminum jet airliner that hit the Pentagon pierced three rings of heavily enforced concrete and yet, left no holes for the wings or tail section. Little pieces were picked up by government men, carted away under a tarp and never seen again. Apparently, he was able to make wings disappear; titanium engines disappear and the entire fuselage disappear! He's also still using mind control on government officials, because they refuse to let us see the 84 surveillance tapes from the Pentagon and from the surrounding businesses that the FBI stole for him just minutes after the show. I guess it's a magician's code thing.

Osama performed the same basic trick with the plane in Pennsylvania, except he added a little touch of art to it. The fuselage, tail section and the titanium engines all vaporized just as at the Pentagon, but he made a debris field eight miles long from a plane that was flown straight down into the ground. It is these added touches that make him so sublime, so brilliant. Terrorist, magician and artist all rolled into one.

Now, at this point, you might be saying, 'Stop, stop, I've got it. He's brilliant and it was a masterpiece'. But, you would be missing the pure genius of this masterpiece. It turns out that once again, just when the audience thought there could not possibly be anymore, the true climax is revealed. As if toying with us, Osama releases a video taking credit for the performance. But, the video was a fake, with a right handed actor playing the role of left handed Bin Laden. It's just confusing, it was a hoax, but why? Artists' license, I guess. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html fake bin laden tape

The US vows to hunt him down and smoke him out of his hole. But, just like the steel from the World Trade Center, almost all of the black boxes and an actual investigation, Bin Laden vanishes into thin air. In what turns out to be more mind control, Bin Laden had US intelligence draft the Patriot Act in secret before 9/11. Through the unread passage of this bill by a mind-controlled Congress, American citizens lost many of their rights under the Constitution. And with continued mind control, the Congress and the President have passed law after law gutting the Constitution. Now all of the freedoms that Osama Bin Laden hated us for have been erased by our own government and we've spent a ½ TRILLION dollars brutally attacking a nation that had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden's grand illusion.

Along with the planes, the buildings, his assistants, the US air defense system and any curiosity from our representatives and the press as to how he pulled it off, Osama made something else disappear as well. The final curtain opens back up to reveal an American stage now empty. Before Osama Bin Laden's masterpiece of illusion we now call 9/11, that stage was filled with freedoms.

Now I ask you, how magical is that?


More magic from Osama Bin Laden: